NORA and Gallos Brook call for pause in development at Upper Heyford

There is a potential public health scandal waiting for those who continue to build (and have already built) on highly contaminated land at Upper Heyford.

PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are a group of synthetic, non-degradable chemicals widely used in industrial and consumer products for their water-, heat-, and stain-resistant properties. When people live or work around large concentrations of these “forever chemicals,” long-term exposure and accumulation in the body can lead to severe health risks, including kidney and testicular cancers, liver damage, thyroid disease, and immune system disruption. Over 15,000 personal injury lawsuits are currently consolidated in a U.S. federal court (a Multidistrict Litigation, or MDL)

Residents are concerned that they live next to Gallos Brook which is a huge concern and, in the words of MP Calum Miller: “The Gallos Brook in my constituency has the highest concentration of forever chemicals in the country,” The brook has 27,823 – 42,174 ng/L PFAS concentration (that is 43,000 times the UK/EU environmental safety standard)

There are links here (BBC News 25/6/26, 20/5/26, 12/6/26 and 23/6/26) to earlier BBC News coverage of the situation, but many of us are still waiting for updates from OCC, CDC and The Environment Agency.

Developers—including Dorchester Living, Barratt Redrow, David Wilson, and Richborough—continue to push forward with the £4.7 billion project to build 10,000 new homes and related facilities. In doing so, they seem to ignore calls to pause for critical testing, safeguarding, and remediation to protect both current residents and prospective buyers. 1300 homes have already been built on this site and residents have called for action. Developer profit must not be put ahead of public and environmental safety.

Dorchester Living have even made an application this summer (avoiding public objection and comment) relating to 62 houses and a sports centre which will be within 200 metres of sites which have been tested and found to have significant levels of toxic PFAS contamination in surface water. The site is also within 300 metres of a stream where 42,174ngl of PFAS was recorded (43,000 times the safe level).

The Environment Agency says airports and other sites where fire training has taken place are hotspots for PFAS

The Gallos Brook Team has been carrying out testing on more sites with readings which demonstrate the wide spread concerns, not only to those living and working in Upper Heyford, but further afield in Ardley, Bucknell, Baynards Green and Stoke Lyne. Look out for our next update, where we will share the readings. This area is possibly subject to unprecedented development (13 proposals within a 5 mile radius of Bicester) and each of these sites (downstream of the northern bomb stores at RAF Upper Heyford) are likely to have soil and water running through them which contain high levels of PFAS “forever chemicals”.

WHAT YOU CAN DO?

Email: planning@cherwell-dc.gov.uk stating your reasons for objecting to Dorchester Living’s most recent application (reference 26/01163/REM) on the grounds of PFAS testing and remediation and public and environmental safety being of local and national importance.

Email our MP: calum.miller.mp@parliament.uk to ask for him to raise this issue in parliament again. We will not go quiet about this when human lives and the environment are being affected.

2 responses to “NORA and Gallos Brook call for pause in development at Upper Heyford”

  1. I was disappointed that Cherwell Planning C’tee approved the plans [25/02918/OUT] for the Fuel Depot at Islip (at the other end of the pipeline to Upper Heyford) without getting proper information on the PFAS there.

    The Environment Agency response https://planningregister.cherwell.gov.uk/Document/Download?module=PLA&recordNumber=164839&planId=2393064&imageId=58&isPlan=False&fileName=Land%20at%20Islip%20Fuel%20Depot.docx

    ” We believe that it would place an unreasonable burden on the developer to ask for more detailed information prior to the granting of planning permission but respect that this is a decision for the local planning authority..”

    seemed odd considering the issues up the road at the airbase and the picture in Plate 07 on page 26 of the Desk Study shows PFAS containing fluoroprotein drums in the Foam Shed found during the Walkover survey of the site. (It didn’t say if they were full or empty !).

    It would be a pity if history repeated itself in Islip.

    Like

  2. […] levels of PFAS found in streams which come from the ex-military base at Uppoer Heyford. Read our blog post which highlights the health concerns which are likely to be linked to PFAS, PFOS or PFOA readings […]

    Like

Leave a Reply